Articles favoris

30 articles disponibles

Emotion Impact and Contagion Mechanism of Misinformation: A Network-Based Risk Analysis.

The proliferation of online misinformation poses severe societal risks, including public health crises and political polarization, with emotional manipulation serving as a key driver of its spread. Ho…

Polarisation politique et co-présence sociale numérique
Chen, Q. (2026). Emotion Impact and Contagion Mechanism of Misinformation: A Network-Based Risk Analysis.. Risk Anal, 46(6), e70265. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70265

Two Kinds of "Woke"? Psychometric Validation of the Critical Right Scale and Revised Critical Social Justice Attitudes Scale.

This study developed and validated the Critical Right Scale (CRS) to measure emerging critical right attitudes and revised the Critical Social Justice Attitudes Scale (CSJAS-R), replicating its psycho…

Cognition politique et traitement des médias
Lahtinen, O. (2026). Two Kinds of "Woke"? Psychometric Validation of the Critical Right Scale and Revised Critical Social Justice Attitudes Scale.. Scand J Psychol, 67(3), 814-827. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.70070

Sad but true: how emotions and political ideology shape perceptions of information. âś“

Political and economic challenges, amplified by social media algorithms, are increasingly polarising how people receive and evaluate information. This study examines how political views and immediate …

Polarisation politique et co-présence sociale numérique
Halko, M. L., Halonen, J., Laukkanen, M., Nyberg, H., & Salmela, M. (2026). Sad but true: how emotions and political ideology shape perceptions of information.. Cogn Emot, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2662478

Rating our certainty: how confidence judgments amplify belief polarization.

Although metacognitive reflection (e.g., thinking about our confidence or certainty in a decision) is often assumed to improve decision-making, recent research suggests that eliciting confidence ratin…

Polarisation politique et co-présence sociale numérique
Double, K. S., Pinkus, R. T., Landfear, R., Carnegie, P., Dowell, S., & Goldwater, M. B. (2026). Rating our certainty: how confidence judgments amplify belief polarization.. Psychol Res, 90(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-026-02239-z

Joint attention modulates intergroup altruism via incidental learning of trust.

Joint attention (i.e. looking where others look) can implicitly elicit positive social behaviour: people trust more and are more altruistic toward individuals who are helpful in cueing relevant object…

Attention partagée et cognition sociale
Claveau, C. D. C., Gibbs, L. F., Bayliss, A., Philippe, F. L., & Capozzi, F. (2026). Joint attention modulates intergroup altruism via incidental learning of trust.. Cogn Emot, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2609939

French Validation of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale (SDO) by Ho et al. (2015): A Two-Dimensional Approach to Social Inequality Support. âś“

This pre-registered study presents the French-language validation of the Social Dominance Orientation scale (SDO), originally developed by Ho et al. (2015). The SDO is a key variable in research on in…

Echelles attitudes politiques
Ferreira, S., & Nugier, A. (2026). French Validation of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale (SDO) by Ho et al. (2015): A Two-Dimensional Approach to Social Inequality Support.. Int Rev Soc Psychol, 39, 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.1075

How We Share, Meta-Cognitively.

I argue that the emerging field of collective cognition lacks consensus as to how a psychological state can be shared. Whereas much is known about the basic sensorimotor and cognitive mechanisms of so…

Travaux de Shteynberg
Shteynberg, G. (2026). How We Share, Meta-Cognitively.. Cogn Sci, 50(1), e70175. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70175

A competitive edge: how social cues and spatial congruence influence joint attention in addressed or witnessed interactions.

Joint attention is crucial for the development of social cognition, but whether the type of relationship (i.e. cooperative or competitive) or interaction (e.g. addressed or witnessed) modulates joint …

Attention partagée et cognition sociale Numérique : perception de la présence d'autres individus dans un environnement numérique sans interaction
Blackie, I., Islam, A., Surtees, A., & Elsherif, M. M. (2025). A competitive edge: how social cues and spatial congruence influence joint attention in addressed or witnessed interactions.. R Soc Open Sci, 12(10), 250467. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.250467

Ingroup solidarity drives social media engagement after political crises.

Social media are often said to exacerbate polarization by platforming hostility between groups. However, positive social emotions like ingroup solidarity may also drive social media engagement, partic…

Polarisation politique et co-présence sociale numérique
Marks, M., Kyrychenko, Y., Gärdebo, J., & Roozenbeek, J. (2025). Ingroup solidarity drives social media engagement after political crises.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 122(35), e2512765122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2512765122

Covert orienting: the dark matter of social attention.

Covert visual attention is often seen as a lab phenomenon. Yet, in real-life, people routinely shift their attention to others without moving their eyes, a fact overlooked in most research. To truly u…

Attention partagée et cognition sociale
Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2025). Covert orienting: the dark matter of social attention.. Trends Cogn Sci, 29(7), 597-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.05.001

Motivations to connect with like-minded audiences increase partisan sharing on social media.

Social media have been accused of facilitating the spread of partisan, hostile, and false news in ways that may foster ideological and affective polarization. Prior research has emphasized that indivi…

Polarisation politique et co-présence sociale numérique
Marie, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2025). Motivations to connect with like-minded audiences increase partisan sharing on social media.. PNAS Nexus, 4(7), pgaf197. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf197

Do people prefer to share political information that boosts their ingroup or derogates the outgroup? đź“– En lecture

Recent analyses of social media activity indicate that outgroup animosity drives user engagement more than ingroup favoritism, with content that derogates the outgroup tending to generate more viral r…

Polarisation politique et co-présence sociale numérique
Kasper, J., & Gilovich, T. (2025). Do people prefer to share political information that boosts their ingroup or derogates the outgroup?. J Exp Psychol Gen, 154(5), 1221-1235. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001683